deviant art

Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
[x]
  • Art Print
  • Canvas
  • Photo
more ▶

More from *SoFDMC

Featured in Groups:

Details

April 4, 2012
12.7 MB
5906×4169
Link
Thumb

Statistics

Comments: 35
Favourites: 47 [who?]

Views: 1,672 (4 today)
[x]
:iconsofdmc:
Version 1 and description here: [link]
Hammerhead in the Battlefield: [link]

For the aircraft kills score, Left to Right:

34 Destroyers
3 Aircraft Carriers
4 Battleships (Dreadnaught/comparable to Iowa Class)
18 Tanks
9 Interceptor-type Jet Aircraft
4 Helicopter Gunships

New additions:

1)Main Battle Tank with tank busting gatling gun. Inspired by a comment some years back on some website (in 2007?) about putting an A-10's Avenger Cannon on the Abrams. For longer sustained fire, this tank has 3 drum magazines over 1 carried by the A-10.
As usual with other vehicles, signs of brutal battlefield conditions featured.

2)Armor texture on Hammerhead featured

3)Features sharpened where possible with expanded size of drawing

Update 10/10/2012: Added detail to port side of aircraft
Add a Comment:
 
love 0 0 joy 1 1 wow 0 0 mad 0 0 sad 0 0 fear 1 1 neutral 0 0
:icontngm:
if you are on this thing's list of shit it wants to fuck up, you've had a bad day
Reply
:iconcoffeebean2:
~Coffeebean2 Dec 6, 2012  Hobbyist Photographer
it seems that it doesn't like boats.
Reply
:iconsynersignart:
~synersignart Dec 6, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
what sort of monstrosity is this? it has more guns than any aircraft of its class.
Reply
:iconjazzlizard:
*JazzLizard Oct 19, 2012  Professional Digital Artist
What sort of antiaircraft defense-defenses does this thing have? I'd image something so large and probably not that maneuverable would be quite vulnerable to a barrage of AA rockets or sustained AA machine gun fire.

Also, what is its power plant like? Helicopters are notoriously fuel-inefficient, and something this large and heavy, with six sets of rotors would be even more son.
Reply
:iconsynersignart:
~synersignart Dec 6, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
who needs AA defense with guns that size in can fire shells over the horizons like a battleship does.

bet even other aircraft wont even come close to this thing when armed

the sort of aircrft we wish to see on Expendables 3
Reply
:iconjazzlizard:
*JazzLizard Dec 6, 2012  Professional Digital Artist
Well, modern aircraft have air-to-air missiles that can strike targets over the horizon. All it would take is a single AA missile to destabilize the rotors, cause them to impact one another and this helo would fall from the sky like a crumpled paper airplane. Also, artillery, no matter the range, wouldn't be very effective against massed interceptors, especially if they were designed to combat and kill vehicles like this.
Reply
:iconsofdmc:
*SoFDMC Oct 19, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Good question.

I am still trying to come up with a name for it, this being an alternate universe I try to avoid using labels coming from our world like 'nuclear fission'.

Its power would be above a nuclear fusion engine and perhaps below anti-matter engine in terms of power output. Either way it enables deep blue water operations that allows it to last out in the middle of the ocean for as long as the crew's food supply runs, i.e. like a nuclear-powered sub patrolling the ocean looking for trouble. The massive power output from the engine would also overcome the issue of powering a hypervelocity gun lugging six foot caliber shells.

The issue of 'personal' defense is more complicated. In this alternate universe, one can expect bullets and explosive shells as well as proximity fuses, and from the enemy, these things and including high powered lasers and dumb rockets. Heat-seeking and fire-and-forget missiles are relatively uncommon due to the long running nature of the war making repeated use of expensive expendable 'smart' ammunition prohibitive.

Before this flying battleship, navy engagements involved air to air attacks. However even if the Allies won air-to-air engagements, their conventional aircraft couldn't sink enemy ships which were armed with gigantic ship based AA laser defenses that would vaporize them out of the sky while their standard navy guns would be used in combination with the lasers to severely damage friendly ships attempting to sink them with their weapons.

The Hammerhead was built to fill in this gap as an airborne battleship platform to shoot from a higher altitude. The Hammerhead's huge size and immense engine power allows installation of special armor that's too heavy for other aircraft that weakens and dissipates the lasers while also taking damage from most battleship shells. The side guns and tail gun pod attack ground targets but can also fire at incoming aircraft below the azimuth covered by the rotors.

The Hammerhead's weak point would be attacks from above and behind the azimuth of the tail gunner from interceptor jets based off enemy aircraft carriers, but its huge blades and massive rotor shafts can withstand up to 200 mm explosive shells which allows for more time to get away from a bad situation.

In ad-hoc 'surprise find' attacks it functions like the mission 'Black Cats' from CoD: World at War, and works in 3-unit teams (shown here: [link] ). The inaccurate part in this drawing is the close proximity for dramatic effect, otherwise their main six foot caliber guns firing hyper-velocity shells allow targeting from afar as fire support, reducing damage experienced by front-line units. However they can't target over the horizon or beyond visual range unless given coordinates by a friendly interceptor.

They are almost invincible once they have friendly interceptors to cover the skies above them. Despite their toughness they function best with a combined air force assault like any other unit.
Reply
:iconjazzlizard:
*JazzLizard Oct 19, 2012  Professional Digital Artist
Ah, I was expecting this to be alt-universe based, and I was even going to suggest a lightweight nuclear powerplant if you hadn't thought it up already.

If I was tasked with destroying one of these, I'd probably implement some sort of concussion weapon that would cause the props to warp enough to collide while rotating. I don't care how armored you made them, they'd disintegrate if they ever came into contact with one another in flight.

Other than that, that's some cool back story and it's a pretty neat design as well :)
Reply
:iconsofdmc:
*SoFDMC Oct 19, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Funny enough that was one of the things I thought about when deciding on the coaxial rotor and double rotor (chinook arrangement) design.

But I realized having a large tail gun pod (which is needed so that the craft can concentrate on the frontal assault without having to spin around in a heated battle) would weigh down the rear end. That and the weight of the front weaponry, and the many advantages in coaxial rotors here ([link]) over the disadvantage of mechanical complexity compelled me to use it in the design.

In addition, the tail gun pod's secondary function is to support the rear when the craft has to land on the water. This is so as its great size and weight would disallow it from landing on an aircraft carrier. Its downwash on taking off and landing would warrant the same precautions taken in facing a Category 5 Hurricane which also disallows it from any carrier-borne operations.

At the time I drew this I was hard pressed what to do to work around this using my limited experience as a civil engineer to make it as realistic. Then I realized I had to compromise some realism or end up drawing a fancy looking Apache.

I appreciate your comments and critique which allowed me the opportunity to explain.
Reply
:iconvoughtvindicator:
~VoughtVindicator Sep 13, 2012  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Red wunz go fasta
Reply
Add a Comment: